Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of Bite Force in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Authors: Ahsan, Nafiz; Nessa, Kamrun; Rahman, A .K.M. Anisur; Hafiza, Noor Akhter; Bhuiyan., Mohammad sayeem Rahman;

Assessment of Bite Force in Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Abstract

Abstract Background: Maximum bite force is a valuable objective metric for analyzing masticatory function and assessing the long-term success of implants. The aim of this cross-sectional pilot study was to evaluate the patients with implant-supported fixed prosthesis the maximum bite force. Methods: Twenty individuals were recruited, and each was assessed using a digital bite force sensor for an implant supported posterior fixed dental prosthesis. For the maximum bite force, the researchers took records at three different occluding sites with 30 seconds rest intervals between each trial. For data analysis, the researchers used SPSS version 26.Results: Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analyses. The mean bite force was found to be 43.57% (standard deviation 3.98) and the bite force was 37% to 49%. Sixty percent of participants showed a strength in the range of 43% to 49%. No significant differences were observed between gender (p = 0.830) and between ages (p = 0.762).Conclusion: Based on the findings of this pilot study, it can be concluded that the bite forces of patients with implant-supported fixed prosthesis are similar, irrespective of gender and age. Nonetheless, because of small sample size, larger multicenter studies are required to create normative data and clinical advice regarding bite force assessment in implant-supported restorations. Download Full Article.PDF https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17592855 Home About the Joural Journal Committe Instruction to Contributors Archives BJDRE 15(1) Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education official publication of Bangladesh Academy of Dentistry International (BADI)® ISSN (Online): 2308-9733 ISSN (Print): 22259015 ORCiD@BJDRE,BADI® ZENODO@BJDRE,BADI® OpenAIRE | EXPLOR@BJDRE,BADI®

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Implants, Implant-supported prosthesis, Bite Force, Masticatory function

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green