Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ON TARGETING UNESCO'S BENCHMARK(S) ON BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS TO EDUCATION SECTOR IN NIGERIA: A STATISTICAL CONCEPTUALISATION

Authors: Emmanuel Uchenna, Ohaegbulem;

ON TARGETING UNESCO'S BENCHMARK(S) ON BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS TO EDUCATION SECTOR IN NIGERIA: A STATISTICAL CONCEPTUALISATION

Abstract

The UNESCO’s recommended benchmarks of 15%, 20% and 26% for annual percentagebudgetary allocations to the education sector of Nigeria were targeted beyond 2023. Thepercentage budgetary allocations to the education sector of Nigeria by the FederalGovernment of Nigeria from 1960 to 2023 fell below the UNESCO’s benchmarks, except in1997. The simple linear regression analyses revealed a gradual upward linear trend; withpositive and significant intercept and slope. Also, an upward linear trend was establishedwith positive and significant intercept and slope when the Pre-Recent Democratic Regime(1960-1998) was studied. A downward linear trend, with a positive and significant interceptand a non-significant negative slope was established for the allocations during the RecentDemocratic Regime (1999-2023); and thus the model was not used in the forecasts. Theforecast results, obtained using the model for (1960-2023) showed that the UNESCO’sbenchmarks of 15%, 20%, and 26% would be attained in Nigeria in 2102, 2163, and 2236,respectively. On the other hand, using the model for (1960-1998), the benchmarks of 15%,20%, and 26% would be attained by Nigeria in 2066, 2109, and 2161, respectively. Anattempted targeting on the UNESCO’s benchmarks, when the slope of the model for (1960-2023) was doubled, revealed that the benchmarks of 15%, 20%, and 26% would be attainedby Nigeria in 2031, 2061, and 2098, respectively; while when the slope of the model for(1960-1998) was doubled, two UNESCO’s benchmarks of 20% and 26% would be attained inNigeria in 2034 and 2060, respectively; and that of 15% would have long been attained in2013. In the cases the slopes were tripled, the model for (1960-2023) revealed theattainments of two benchmarks of 20% and 26% in 2027 and 2052, respectively; and that of15% would have long been attained in 2007. Finally, tripling the slope of the model for(1960-1998) revealed that just one benchmark of 26% would be attained in 2027; and thoseof 15% and 20% would have long been attained in 1995 and 2009, respectively. 

Keywords

Targeting, UNESCO's benchmarks, Percentage budgetary allocations, Education financing, Education Sector, Statistical conceptualization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green