Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

KISTI-CWTS Leiden Ranking 2025 indicators for South Korean organizations, benchmark institutions and selected countries

Authors: KISTI; CWTS(Leiden University);

KISTI-CWTS Leiden Ranking 2025 indicators for South Korean organizations, benchmark institutions and selected countries

Abstract

This dataset was developed through a collaborative research project between the Center for Global R&D Analysis at KISTI and the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University. Based on scholarly publication data, it provides science and technology analytics that enable users to explore the research performance of major countries worldwide and Korean institutions through a variety of indicators. This file presents all indicators that are computed for the CWTS Leiden Ranking 2025 for South Korean organisations and benchmark institutions. The two 'Results' worksheets for Korean Main organisations and for the 25 benchmark organisations present separate results for combinations of fields (indicated in column C), a time period (indicated in column D), and a counting method (indicated in column E). Collaboration, open access, and gender indicators are always calculated using full counting. The results for these indicators therefore do not depend on the choice between full and fractional counting. Stability intervals have been calculated for most size-independent indicators. On the 'Results' worksheet, the lower and upper bounds of a stability interval are presented in columns with labels ending with '_lb' and '_ub', respectively. You can view the analysis and visualization results based on this data on our website. G45 Countries Scoreboard (WoS)https://globalrnd.kisti.re.kr/scoreboard/2025/wos/countries Korean Institutions Scoreboard (WoS)https://globalrnd.kisti.re.kr/scoreboard/2025/wos/institutes/domestic For the methodology used to produce this data, as well as the Leiden CWTS Leiden Ranking that serves as its foundational basis, please refer to the website below. http://www.leidenranking.com

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average