Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Advances In Perforator Flap Use For Head And Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Of Clinical Outcomes And Innovations

Authors: Dandoulakis, Emmanouil;

Advances In Perforator Flap Use For Head And Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Of Clinical Outcomes And Innovations

Abstract

The use of perforator flaps has revolutionized head and neck reconstruction. It offers versatile, low-morbidity options to address defects that arise due to either oncologic resection, trauma, or congenital anomalies. This systematic review examines clinical outcomes and new technological developments in the use of perforator flap surgery for head and neck reconstruction. Peer-reviewed studies will be identified through the use of a wide search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (2005 to 2025) related to types of flaps (ALT, PAP, TDAP, DIEP), clinical outcomes (survival, complications, functional and aesthetic outcomes), and technology. For survival and complication rates, data will be extracted to conduct a meta-analysis, whereas data will be extracted to perform a narrative synthesis on the innovations. The expected results are a high survival rate of flaps (99 100 % rate in case of ALT, PAP, TDAP), low rates of donor site morbidity, and better functional (speech, swallowing) and aesthetic outcomes than those available in traditional flaps. Other technologies (Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, freestyle flap design, supermicrosurgery, and robotic assistance) are expected to improve surgical precision and outcomes. Perforator flaps are trusted and effective, and continue to have breakthroughs in their area of applicability. Future studies should focus on standardized outcome reports, prospective multicenter research, and the use of novel flap designs and bioengineered grafts to refine head and neck reconstruction further.

Keywords

Head And Neck Reconstruction, Perforator Flaps, Surgical Innovations, Flap Survival, Clinical Outcomes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green