Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Genomics and Machine Learning Uncover Diapause Mechanisms and Predict Voltinism in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus

Authors: Palmieri, Luciano;

Genomics and Machine Learning Uncover Diapause Mechanisms and Predict Voltinism in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus

Abstract

================================================================================Genomics and Machine Learning Uncover Diapause Mechanisms and Predict Voltinism in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus================================================================================ DATASET DESCRIPTION-------------------This repository contains the code and analytical pipeline used to identify genetic polymorphisms associated with diapause phenotypes in the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. The analysis combines genome-wide association study (GWAS) with machine learning (ML) to predict facultative versus obligate diapause phenotypes, with implications for understanding voltinism and outbreak risk. ================================================================================STUDY OVERVIEW================================================================================ Citation: Palmieri, L., Dowle, E.J., Nadachowska-Brzyska, K., Schopf, A., Dobart, N., Stauffer, C., Schuler, H., Ragland, G.J., & Schebeck, M. (2025). Genomics and Machine Learning Uncover Diapause Mechanisms and Predict Voltinism in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus. Molecular Ecology. Authors: Luciano Palmieri Contact: luciano.palmierirocha@unibz.it code revised with Claude Sonnet 4.5 ================================================================================ABBREVIATIONS AND CODES================================================================================ Sample Population Codes------------------------* LOW: Central European low-altitude population (Prinzersdorf, Austria; 48°22'N, 15°48'E; 350 m)* HIGH: Central European high-altitude population (Gesäuse, Austria; 47°35'N, 14°38'E; 1500 m)* NORTH: Northern European population (Vindeln, Sweden; 64°12'N, 19°43'E; 300 m) Phenotype Classifications-------------------------* Facultative diapause: Individuals capable of producing multiple generations per year under favorable conditions* Obligate diapause: Individuals with univoltine life cycle regardless of environmental conditions Technical Abbreviations-----------------------* GWAS: Genome-Wide Association Study* ML: Machine Learning* BF: Bayes Factor (strength of association in GWAS)* VCA: Variance Component Analysis* VC: Variance Component* SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism* ddRAD: Double-Digest Restriction-Associated DNA sequencing* AUROC: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve* GO: Gene Ontology* JHE: Juvenile Hormone Esterase* LG: Linkage Group (chromosome) ================================================================================FILE DESCRIPTIONS================================================================================ 1. params-Ips_ipyrad.txt-------------------------Description: Parameter file for ipyrad v.0.9.95 assemblyPurpose: Configuration for ddRAD sequence assembly and SNP callingUsage: Input for ipyrad pipeline to generate VCF files from raw sequencing data 2. phenotype_pruned_filtered75missing_LD.vcf---------------------------------------------Description: Filtered and LD-pruned VCF file for phenotyped individualsPurpose: Final quality-controlled SNP dataset for GWAS and ML analysesContent: 11,867 SNPs across 296 phenotyped individuals after filtering for: - Maximum 25% missing data per SNP - Linkage disequilibrium (r² 6) and ML analysis - Gene annotation file (GFF/GTF) - Gene-to-GO mapping file - Gene length fileOutput: - SNP-to-gene mappings - GO enrichment results - Enriched biological pathwaysDependencies: GenomicRanges, goseq ================================================================================ANALYTICAL PIPELINE (ORDER OF EXECUTION)================================================================================ STEP 1: RAD Sequencing and SNP Calling---------------------------------------Command: ipyrad -p params-Ips_ipyrad.txt -s 1234567Input: Raw ddRAD sequencing reads (available at NCBI SRA: PRJDB38037)Output: VCF file with ~134,410 SNPs across 574 individuals STEP 2: Population Structure Analysis--------------------------------------Command: Rscript VCA_and_PopGEN_script.rInput: Raw VCF file from Step 1Output: VC scores, population structure plots STEP 3: VCF Filtering, Gene Annotation, and GWAS-------------------------------------------------Command (Windows): Filtering_Liftoff_and_Baypass_GWAS.batCommand (Linux/Mac): bash Filtering_Liftoff_and_Baypass_GWAS.txt Input: - Filtered VCF from ipyrad - Reference genome and annotations - VC scores from Step 2 Output: - Filtered VCF (11,867 SNPs after QC and LD pruning) - Gene annotations - Baypass results with Bayes Factors for each SNP Key GWAS Results: - 185 SNPs with BF > 2 (weak association) - 48 SNPs with BF > 6 (moderate association) - 13 SNPs with BF > 10 (strong association) - Top SNP: Juvenile hormone esterase (JHE) locus (BF = 18.42) STEP 4: Machine Learning - Hyperparameter Optimization-------------------------------------------------------Command: python Hyperparameter_tuning.pyInput: Phenotyped individuals SNP matrix + VC scoresOutput: Optimal hyperparameters (learning rate, number of leaves, depth, etc.) STEP 5: Machine Learning - Model Training and Validation---------------------------------------------------------Command: python LightGBM_training_KFold.py Input: - Phenotyped individuals (296 samples) - Top 25 ML-ranked SNPs + GWAS SNPs (BF > 6) - VC1, VC2, VC3 scores - Optimized hyperparameters Output: - Trained model: BEST_model_phenotyped_kfold_lgbmAUROC.pkl - SNP importance rankings - Performance: AUROC = 0.918, Mean Accuracy = 0.856 Top ML Results: - JHE locus ranked #1 (importance score = 2847.81) - Only 2 SNPs overlapped between GWAS BF>10 and ML top 25 - Best model: ML top 25 + GWAS BF>6 + VCA STEP 6: Phenotype Prediction in Wild Populations-------------------------------------------------Command: python Wild_phenotype_classifier.py Input: - Wild individuals SNP matrix (232 samples) - Trained model from Step 5 - VC scores for wild individuals Output: Predicted phenotype frequencies per population Wild Population Predictions: - NORTH (n=76): 98% obligate diapause (univoltine) - HIGH (n=77): 46% obligate, 54% facultative - LOW (n=79): 41% obligate, 59% facultative (multivoltine potential) STEP 7: Functional Annotation and GO Enrichment------------------------------------------------Command: Rscript SNP_mapping_and_GO_enrichment_script.r Input: - Significant SNPs from GWAS and ML - Gene annotations - Gene lengths - Gene-to-GO mappings Output: - SNP-gene overlaps - Enriched GO terms - Biological pathways implicated in diapause Key Enriched Pathways (both GWAS and ML): - Chromosome organization (GO:0051276) - Endocytosis (GO:0006897) - Scavenger receptor activity (GO:0005044) ================================================================================REQUIRED SOFTWARE AND VERSIONS================================================================================ Bioinformatics Tools--------------------* ipyrad: v0.9.95 (RAD-seq assembly)* vcftools: v0.1.16 (VCF filtering)* plink: v1.90b6.21 (LD pruning)* Liftoff: v1.6.3 (gene annotation transfer)* Baypass: v2.41 (GWAS analysis)* STRUCTURE: v2.3 (population structure) R and R Packages----------------* R: v4.4.2* vcfR: v1.7.0.91* adegenet: v1.3.1* rrBLUP: v4.6.3* GenomicRanges (Bioconductor)* goseq: v1.60.0* pophelper: v2.3.1 Python and Python Packages---------------------------* Python: v3.8+* lightgbm: v4.5.0* optuna: v4.2.0* pandas: v2.1.4* numpy: v2.1.3* scikit-learn: v1.5.2* joblib: v1.4.2 ================================================================================DATA FILES REQUIRED================================================================================ Input Data Files (NOT INCLUDED)----------------These files should be obtained separately or generated from raw sequencing data: 1. Raw sequencing reads: Available at NCBI SRA (BioProject: PRJDB38037)2. Reference genome: Ips typographus genome assembly (Nadachowska-Brzyska et al., 2025)3. Gene annotations: Transferred from Powell et al. (2021) using Liftoff4. Phenotype data: Binary labels (0/1) for obligate/facultative diapause (determined experimentally)5. Gene-to-GO mapping: Gene IDs with associated GO terms6. Gene lengths: Gene IDs with exon-based lengths in base pairs Data Files Included in This Repository---------------------------------------* phenotype_pruned_filtered75missing_LD.vcf: Filtered SNPs for 296 phenotyped individuals* WILD.recode.vcf: Filtered SNPs for 232 wild individuals* pop_assign.txt: Population assignments for all samples ================================================================================KEY PARAMETERS AND THRESHOLDS================================================================================ VCF Filtering-------------* Missing data threshold: 25%* LD pruning: r² = 0.2, window = 50 SNPs, step = 10 SNPs* Final SNP count: 11,867 (after filtering from 134,410) Baypass GWAS------------* MCMC runs: 5 independent runs with different seeds* Burn-in: 2,500 iterations* Pilot runs: 20 (npilot)* Pilot length: 200 iterations* Association strength interpretation: - BF > 2: Weak association - BF > 6: Moderate association - BF > 10: Strong association LightGBM Machine Learning--------------------------* Cross-validation: 50-fold* Hyperparameter optimization: 2,000 Optuna trials* Binary classification threshold: 0.5* Missing data handling: Native LightGBM imputation* Feature encoding: 0 (homozygous ref), 2 (heterozygous), 3 (homozygous alt) GO Enrichment-------------* Background: All genes in RAD-seq dataset* Foreground: Genes with SNPs (BF > 6 for GWAS; non-zero importance for ML)* Test: Wallenius' noncentral hypergeometric distribution* Length bias correction: Included via goseq ================================================================================EXPECTED OUTPUTS AND INTERPRETATION================================================================================ GWAS Results------------* High BF SNPs: Strong candidates for diapause regulation* JHE locus: Top-ranked SNP suggests juvenile hormone pathway involvement* Moderate BF SNPs: Additional candidates for multi-locus architecture Machine Learning Results------------------------* High importance SNPs: Most informative for phenotype prediction* AUROC > 0.9: Excellent discriminative ability* Accuracy ~86%: Robust phenotype classification Wild Population Predictions----------------------------* High proportion of obligate diapause (>90%): Univoltine populations, lower outbreak risk* High proportion of facultative diapause (>50%): Multivoltine potential, higher outbreak risk* Intermediate proportions: Variable voltinism depending on environmental conditions ================================================================================CITATIONS================================================================================ Key Methods References----------------------* ipyrad: Eaton & Overcast (2020) Bioinformatics 36:2592-2594* vcftools: Danecek et al. (2011) Bioinformatics 27:2156-2158* plink: Purcell et al. (2007) Am J Hum Genet 81:559-575* Liftoff: Shumate & Salzberg (2021) Bioinformatics 37:1639-1643* Baypass: Gautier (2015) Genetics 201:1555-1579* LightGBM: Ke et al. (2017) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30:3149-3157* goseq: Young et al. (2010) Genome Biology 11:R14 Reference Genome----------------* Powell et al. (2021) Communications Biology 4:1059* Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. (2025) in preparation ================================================================================HOW TO CITE THIS DATASET================================================================================ Recommended citation format: Palmieri, L., Dowle, E.J., Nadachowska-Brzyska, K., Schopf, A., Dobart, N., Stauffer, C., Schuler, H., Ragland, G.J., & Schebeck, M. (2025). Genomics and Machine Learning Uncover Diapause Mechanisms and Predict Voltinism in Ips typographus - Analysis Pipeline and Data [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17543185 Last updated: November 2025

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average