
11th CBEES ANNUAL CONFERENCE: Knowing Eastern Europe and the Baltics Programme At a time when uncertainty defines both the world and what we know of it—when knowledge appears fragmented, contested, and inadequate—we turn our attention to the very processes of knowing. How is knowledge produced, by whom, where, and under what conditions? How do shifting geopolitical landscapes, emergent crises, and new epistemic frameworks challenge modes of understanding? The CBEES Annual Conference 2025 will explore the shifting grounds of knowledge production and critically examine processes of knowing, geopolitics of knowledge, and different positionalities with respect to Eastern Europe and the Baltics. This undertaking also means to embrace the unexpected and the conference is an opportunity to investigate how knowledge emerges in moments of rupture, how new forms of knowing take shape, and how new relations and vantage points might reconfigure theoretical and empirical landscapes of knowing.At the same time, the question arises of how to approach the allure of denial and ignorance. We invite contributions exploring conceptual, empirical, and methodological underpinnings of knowing and knowledge production on topics featuring Eastern Europe and the Baltics. Both contemporary and historical perspectives are of interest. Proposals are welcome for roundtables, panels, and individual paper presentations. We invite scholars from all disciplines, offering the following points for inspiration: “East” and “West” dimensions in knowledge production. Questions of centre and periphery. Constructing and naming a region - regions as epistemic entities, objects, subjects. Paradigm shifts; critical challenges to canon and master theories. Empirical knowledge and possibilities to challenge universalities through particularities. Doubt, indeterminate knowledge, and how to approach the unknowable. Negation and denial; the allure of ignorance. Interrogating epistemic hierarchies and geopolitical assumptions that have historically shaped research in and on the region. The decolonial turn and epistemology. Gender and knowledge production. Claims and limitations of authority and expertise. How researchers’ positionalities, and engagements with the region shape epistemologies. Embodied, situated, and practical knowledge. Numbers and data. Knowledge production through quantitative research. Artistic expressions of knowing and the unknown. Violence, war, and the impact of existential threats on processes of knowing. Truth and lies, understanding propaganda production. New technologies and AI. Constructing the present by erasing/rewriting the past; remembering and forgetting as forms of knowing/unknowing.
In this presentation, I want to think more about elusive concoctions of geographies and time: geo-temporalities, symbolically marked by a hyphen of connection, and yet still, a fissure of separation. It alludes to the inseparable nature of the place/location and cultural perceptions of time/temporality, and as a result, to the socio-political consequences of such collusions. In particular, the affirmation and contestation of what is gender, (homo)sexuality, and knowledge is the central focus of interrogation in transnational politics as a litmus test of “globalization,” “Europeanization,” the idea of Europe, and “civilization” itself. Gender, sexuality, and (il)legitimacy of knowledge surrounding them has become the implicit and explicit battleground of political ideologies and strategies, variably expounded across the left–liberal–conservative–right continuum. The attitudes towards, understandings of, representations of, relations to, and perceptions of identities and/or practices of gender, sexuality (especially homosexuality), and the knowledge produced about them, have become the defining markers of what Europe might have signified, what it does signify, what it should have signified, what it will have signified. And the different grammatical tenses here are deliberately used to highlight the underlying temporality in our operationalizations of the symbolic and material dimension of ideas, practices, places. The presention This will draw from the findings of the EU Horizon Europe grant “RESIST Project: Fostering Queer Feminist Intersectional Resistances against Transnational Anti-Gender Politics” (https://theresistproject.eu/).
Gender Equity, Gender inequality, Orientalism, Science, Knowledge Production, Central and Eastern Europe, Epistemology, Violence, Feminism, Epistemics, Science/history, Gender equality, Standpoint Theory, Sociology, Indigenous knowledge, Social Justice, Epistemic Violence, Sexual violence, Science/ethics, Sociology/ethics, Political violence, Occidentalism, LGBT, Decolonial Thought, Gender Identity, Gender, Post-Enlightenment, Knowledge organization, Knowledge Paradigme, Epistemic Justice, FOS: Sociology, LGBTIQ, Knowledge, Anti-Gender, Post-colonial thought, Gender studies, Poland
Gender Equity, Gender inequality, Orientalism, Science, Knowledge Production, Central and Eastern Europe, Epistemology, Violence, Feminism, Epistemics, Science/history, Gender equality, Standpoint Theory, Sociology, Indigenous knowledge, Social Justice, Epistemic Violence, Sexual violence, Science/ethics, Sociology/ethics, Political violence, Occidentalism, LGBT, Decolonial Thought, Gender Identity, Gender, Post-Enlightenment, Knowledge organization, Knowledge Paradigme, Epistemic Justice, FOS: Sociology, LGBTIQ, Knowledge, Anti-Gender, Post-colonial thought, Gender studies, Poland
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
