
Against the backdrop of global economic transformation and regional integration, Vocational Education and Training (VET) has emerged as a core force underpinning national development strategies. This study employs systematic qualitative comparative analysis and comparative case - study methods. Based on the latest policy documents of China and Mongolia, statistical data from international institutions, and peer - reviewed literature from 2015 to 2024, it systematically analyzes the characteristic differences, core challenges, and collaborative potential of the VET systems in China and Mongolia from five dimensions: governance models, scale and resource allocation, curriculum design and industry connection, financing mechanisms, and quality assessment systems. The study finds that China has developed a VET model featuring centralized national governance, large - scale operation, and deep integration with key industries, but faces challenges such as uneven regional quality and insufficient participation of small and medium - sized enterprises. Mongolia, on the other hand, has constructed a streamlined and flexible VET system centered around Competency - Based Training (CBT) and emphasizing international cooperation, yet is hampered by fiscal vulnerability and limited capacity for on - the - job internships. The complementary advantages of the two countries in governance mechanisms, resource allocation, curriculum models, etc., provide a solid foundation for cooperation. Based on this, this study proposes three specific cooperation paths: joint development of cross - border industry - oriented courses, establishment of a China - Mongolia Vocational Education Cooperation Center, and implementation of cultural - heritage - oriented vocational education. These suggestions aim to provide empirical support and policy references for regional human resource development under the China - Mongolia - Russia Economic Corridor and the Belt and Road Initiative.
Vocational Education, Comparative Study, Skills Development, Mongolian-Sino Cooperation.
Vocational Education, Comparative Study, Skills Development, Mongolian-Sino Cooperation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
