Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Security Agencies and Election Management in Nigeria: A Study Of 2019 General Election in Akwa Ibom State

Authors: Chijioke Basil Onuoha; Udoh Godwin Aniedi; Umachi Eze Victor;

Security Agencies and Election Management in Nigeria: A Study Of 2019 General Election in Akwa Ibom State

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the nexus between election security and democratic consolidation in Nigeria through a documentary, descriptive analysis of the 2019 Akwa Ibom State gubernatorial election. Grounded in the view that security underpins human development and democratic legitimacy, the research reviewed secondary sources INEC documents, observer reports, scholarly articles, and policy texts to assess how security institutions shape electoral credibility across the pre-election, election-day, and post-election phases. Findings show that while security agencies are constitutionally central to protecting voters, officials, materials, and procedures, multiple constraints undermined their effectiveness in 2019: ambiguous legal and operational mandates between agencies and the EMB; underfunding and uneven resource deployment; weak, slow, or fragmented inter-agency communication; outdated information and intelligence systems; political interference that compromised neutrality; skills gaps in de-escalation, crowd management, and cyber-related risks; inconsistent enforcement of electoral laws; limited coordination; and low transparency and accountability. These deficits enabled practices intimidation, vote-buying, and targeted violence that erode voter confidence and blunt democratic consolidation. The study concludes that credible elections in Nigeria depend not only on the presence of security personnel but on their professionalism, impartiality, and integration into a coherent, adequately financed, intelligence-led security architecture coordinated with INEC. It recommends clarifying legal roles and accountability lines; increasing timely, ring-fenced funding; modernizing communications and intelligence systems; instituting joint operations planning and exercises; expanding targeted training (rights-based policing, de-escalation, chain-of-custody, cyber hygiene); insulating deployments from partisanship; and strengthening transparent monitoring and after-action reviews. Implemented together, these measures can reduce electoral violence, improve public trust, and advance Nigeria’s democratic consolidation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Election Security, Democratic Consolidation, INEC, Nigeria Police Force, Structural Functionalism, Electoral Violence, Political Interference, Security Agencies, Governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green