The July Revolution 2024 in Bangladesh, ignited by the student-led quota reform movement, culminated in the ousting of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the establishment of an interim government. Central to this upheaval was the "July National Charter," a political declaration outlining reforms and a new governance framework. Some national and Islamic political parties in Bangladesh who were the actors for the July Revolution 2024, have advocated for the legal validation of this charter through a constitutional order or national referendum. This paper examines the intersections of popular sovereignty, plebiscitary democracy, and constitutional legality within the context of Bangladesh’s political landscape. By analyzing historical precedents, comparative examples, and relevant legal frameworks, the study explores whether a plebiscite can serve as a legitimate mechanism to institutionalize revolutionary mandates without undermining constitutional stability. The research further assesses the potential risks and benefits of legal recognition, considering both domestic and international perspectives. Findings highlight the delicate balance between revolutionary legitimacy, electoral credibility, and democratic consolidation, offering insights into the challenges of translating popular will into legally enforceable norms.