
This paper explores the relationship between conceptualization and metonymy within the framework of cognitive linguistics. Conceptualization refers to the mental process through which humans structure and interpret experiences, while metonymy operates as a cognitive mechanism that allows one conceptual entity to stand for another within the same domain. The paper discusses how metonymy differs from metaphor, yet interacts with it in shaping meaning. By reviewing theoretical perspectives from Lakoff, Johnson, Langacker, and Kövecses, the study demonstrates that metonymy is not merely a linguistic phenomenon but a conceptual tool deeply embedded in human cognition. Several linguistic examples from English illustrate how metonymy functions in discourse to facilitate understanding and mental economy. The study concludes that metonymy plays a central role in conceptual organization, influencing not only language but also thought and cultural representation.
conceptualization, metonymy, cognitive linguistics, metaphor, mental mapping, conceptual domain, embodiment, semantics
conceptualization, metonymy, cognitive linguistics, metaphor, mental mapping, conceptual domain, embodiment, semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
