Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN AI-GENERATED AND HUMAN-WRITTEN ENGLISH TEXTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Other literature type 04 Nov 2025Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Tojiboyeva, Mushtariybonu;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17519946 , 10.5281/zenodo.17519947

SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN AI-GENERATED AND HUMAN-WRITTEN ENGLISH TEXTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Abstract

This paper explores the syntactic complexity of English texts generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) compared to those written by humans. The study aims to identify how AI structures sentences, uses subordinate clauses, and manages syntactic variation in contrast to human writing. A corpus of 40 texts—20 written by humans and 20 generated by Chat GPT—was analyzed using measures such as mean sentence length, subordination ratio, and clause density. The results reveal that AI-generated texts tend to exhibit syntactic balance and formal regularity, while human-written texts demonstrate greater syntactic variation and stylistic flexibility.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green