Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Barriers to Social Support Access in Urban vs. Rural Older Adults U.S Populations: A Scoping Review

Authors: Rose Therra Nortey; Adejo Samuel Egbunu; Edward Oware;

Barriers to Social Support Access in Urban vs. Rural Older Adults U.S Populations: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Background: Social support, including emotional, instrumental, and informational forms, is a critical social determinant of health in later life, and adequate emotional support is tightly linked to higher self-rated health in U.S. older adults. However, in rural communities, accessing social support is particularly challenging due to structural barriers, including transportation, provider, and telecommunications infrastructure shortages. Objective: This scoping review aims to map and characterize barriers to access to social support among community-dwelling older adults in rural and urban areas in the United States and identify research gaps to inform policy and practice. Methods: The review is based on the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, AgeLine, Web of Science, and Scopus, as well as relevant U.S. agency and gray literature sources. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs reporting on barriers to emotional, instrumental, or informational support measured among adults aged at least 60 years after 1990 and published in English. Barriers will be organized using five supply-side domains: approachability, availability/accommodation, affordability, acceptability, and appropriateness. Expected outcomes: Preliminary synthesis suggested that rural barriers are mostly supply-side structural transportation, workforce, and broadband, whereas urban barriers are more commonly demand-side fragmentation, eligibility bottlenecks, and cultural mismatches. Research gaps include inconsistent rural/urban definitions, underrepresentation of minority elders, and lack of distinction between structural and functional support measures. Conclusion: Tackling rural supply-side barriers is crucial for attaining just aging in place and realizing geographic disparities in the health-related benefits of ample social support.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green