
False Enlightenment as “Pseudo Rigpa” and the Commodification of Love: How Non-Monogamy, Polyamory, and Modern Ideologies Misappropriate Dharma, Commercialize Liberation, and Market Pseudo-Spirituality is a cross-disciplinary investigation into the ideological and cultural mechanisms behind modern pseudo-spirituality.The book argues that much of what is presented today as “liberation,” “non-attachment,” or “authentic love” represents not true spiritual awakening but its ideological imitation — a false enlightenment that merges spiritual rhetoric with neoliberal and consumerist logic. This phenomenon, termed Pseudo-Rigpa, exposes how contemporary movements such as non-monogamy, polyamory, and pop-spirituality commodify love, transcendence, and even moral detachment.Integrating Buddhist psychology, moral philosophy, and cultural theory, the study examines how modern ideologies have re-engineered the language of Dharma to legitimize indulgence, narcissism, and emotional disengagement. What once sought transcendence now markets gratification; what once demanded renunciation now glorifies indulgence; and what once promised liberation now functions as a refined system of psychological, moral, and economic control.This work is part of the Aletheia Project, an ongoing interdisciplinary research program exploring the intersections of mind, ideology, and civilization through Integrative Theoretical System Studies (ITSS).Keywords: False Enlightenment, Pseudo-Rigpa, Dharma, Polyamory, Non-Monogamy, Consumer Spirituality, Neoliberalism, Hedonism, Ideological Control, Cultural Theory, Aletheia ProjectLicensing clarification:This work is released under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.Full license text: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.This note supersedes Figshare’s default CC BY 4.0 selection to preserve author’s original licensing terms.
Ethics, History, Buddhist Psychology, Freud, History of philosophy, History of Philosophy of Ideas, Philosophy of Mind, Moral Philosophy, Cultural Philosophy, Meta-Integrative Phenomenology, Sociology of Desire, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, Philosophy, Continental Philosophy, Political philosophy, History of Philosophy of Ideologies, Psychology, Jung, Phenomenology, Buddhist Philosophy, Cognitive Behavioral Theory, Cognitive Sciences, Cultural anthropology
Ethics, History, Buddhist Psychology, Freud, History of philosophy, History of Philosophy of Ideas, Philosophy of Mind, Moral Philosophy, Cultural Philosophy, Meta-Integrative Phenomenology, Sociology of Desire, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, Philosophy, Continental Philosophy, Political philosophy, History of Philosophy of Ideologies, Psychology, Jung, Phenomenology, Buddhist Philosophy, Cognitive Behavioral Theory, Cognitive Sciences, Cultural anthropology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
