Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Biodiversity, Indigenous Knowledge, and Governance in Africa: An In‐Depth Review

Authors: Daniel Chukwuma Nzereogu, PhD1; Chukwu, Chikaodinaka James2;

Biodiversity, Indigenous Knowledge, and Governance in Africa: An In‐Depth Review

Abstract

This review synthesizes the recent literature (2023–2025) at the intersection of biodiversity conservation, international relations, and local knowledge systems, with a special focus on Nigeria and Africa more broadly. Six core studies are examined, covering thematic areas such as climate policy alignment, indigenous ecological knowledge (IEK), sacred forests and religious belief systems, biodiversity monitoring, and pan‐African conservation agendas (notably the "30 by 30" target). Across these works, several recurring tensions emerge: the disjunction between global environmental commitments and local realities; the under‐recognition of indigenous/local knowledge in law and policy; issues of equity, participation, and governance; data and monitoring deficits; and funding limitations. The review highlights how conservation effectiveness in Africa, and in Nigeria in particular, depends upon integrating local cultural / spiritual practices, securing indigenous rights, improving data infrastructures, and designing governance frameworks that bridge levels (local, national, regional, international). Recommendations are forwarded for future research and policy design, including the need for comparative case studies, participatory approaches, legal reforms that respect customary systems, and long‐term capacity building.

Keywords

knowledge,, Environment,, Governance,, Ecology,, Climate, Conservation,, Indigenous,, Biodiversity,

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center