
Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq (1971) stands as a powerful political allegory that reinterprets history to reflect the complexities of postcolonial governance. Set in the 14th century but resonating deeply with modern India, the play presents Muhammad bin Tughlaq not merely as a historical figure, but as a symbol of the tragic collapse of visionary politics. This paper explores the politics of history in Tughlaq, focusing on the Sultan’s paradoxical blend of secular idealism, rational governance, and tyrannical control. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and episodic structure, Karnad critiques the dangers of utopian leadership untempered by pragmatism or empathy. Tughlaq’s policies—rational on the surface—reveal an underlying absurdity when divorced from the lived realities of his subjects, resulting in state violence, mass suffering, and the erosion of trust. Drawing from historical sources, postcolonial criticism, and dramatic theory, the study shows how Karnad uses the past to interrogate the present. The play thus becomes a mirror for India’s own post-independence disillusionment, revealing the psychological and political consequences of unchecked power. Ultimately, Tughlaq is not just a historical drama, but a timeless political tragedy—exposing the cyclical nature of tyranny masked as reform and the fragility of idealism in the corridors of power.
Tughlaq, Political Drama, Historical Allegory, Paranoia and Power, Secular Idealism, Postcolonial Theatre.
Tughlaq, Political Drama, Historical Allegory, Paranoia and Power, Secular Idealism, Postcolonial Theatre.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
