
Adjudication without jurisdiction is a nullity. Justiciability and competence otherwise called locus standi are two of the many factors that can rob the Court of its jurisdiction. Although these two concepts are different, they are often misunderstood to mean the same thing. Deploying the doctrinal research method, this paper considered statutory provisions and judicial decisions on the concepts of justiciability and competence and found that while justiciability relates to the adjudicatory power of the Court over the matter, competence relates to the capacity of the person maintaining the suit. To resolve this quagmire, it was recommended that when objection to jurisdiction is taken, Counsel must be clear on which leg the objection is standing in order to assist the trial Court determine whether objection is taken as to the justiciability or competence or locus standi of the party as this will enhance both the speed and transparency of adjudicatory process.
jurisdiction, competence, locus standi, justiciability, Jurisdiction
jurisdiction, competence, locus standi, justiciability, Jurisdiction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
