Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AI-Driven Frameworks for Anomaly Detection: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Financial Fraud and Cybersecurity

Authors: Devireddy Ramadevi;

AI-Driven Frameworks for Anomaly Detection: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Financial Fraud and Cybersecurity

Abstract

ABSTRACT The proliferation of digital transactions and interconnected networks has exposed organizations to increasingly complex cyber and financial threats, rendering traditional rule-based detection models inadequate. This study develops and evaluates a hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework for anomaly detection, integrating supervised and unsupervised learning paradigms to enhance fraud detection and cybersecurity resilience. Comparative analyses demonstrate that ensemble supervised models, such as Random Forest and LightGBM, achieve high accuracy (up to 95.8%) and AUC scores (0.97) in structured fraud data, while deep unsupervised models—Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks—effectively identify novel cyber anomalies. Real-time processing through streaming analytics and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures further reduces detection latency below 200ms. The findings highlight that AI integration yields a measurable operational advantage, with institutions reporting over $2.22 million in annual cost savings and a 50% reduction in analyst workload. Ethical imperatives, including Explainable AI (XAI), fairness, and cognitive cybersecurity, are underscored as critical for compliance and trust in autonomous detection systems. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Anomaly Detection, Financial Fraud Detection, Cybersecurity, Deep Learning (DL), Explainable AI (XAI)

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green