Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Danae Reiche 1847

Authors: Alekseev, Vitalii; Tomaszewska, Wioletta;

Danae Reiche 1847

Abstract

Genus Danae Reiche, 1847 Type species: Danae rufula Reiche, 1847 Taxonomic assignment. The inclusion examined shows a combination of external characters corresponding to the subfamily Endomychinae within the family Endomychidae: (1) elongate oval, convex body with pubescent dorsum, (2) 11-segmented antennae with loose 3-segmented antennal club, (3) discernible fronto-clypeal suture, (4) presence of two longitudinal sulci on the pronotum, (5) pronotum with broad lateral, raised margins, (6) postcoxal lines on abdominal ventrite 1 absent, (7) abdominal ventrite 1 longest, and (8) tarsi pseudotrimerous with lobed tarsomeres 1 and 2. The specimen considered here is assigned to the genus Danae Reiche based on a combination of the following morphological characters: (1) pronotum with broad, raised side margins (in contrast to extant Africanasaula, Saula and Tragoscelis or extinct Zemyna), and not distinctly narrower than elytral base (contrary to Africanasaula, Saula or Zemyna); (2) dorsum distinctly pubescent (in contrast to extant Endomychus with glabrous or very finely pubescent dorsum); (3) distinct transverse basal sulcus of pronotum (absent in Ectomychus); (4) elongate, loose antennal club, and elongate body form (antennal club rather short and compact, and comparatively more oval and more globose body in most species of Stenotarsus); (5) pronotal posterior angles not indented to receive the humeral portion of elytra (in contrast to Tharina); (6) elytra not striate, only with fine incomplete sutural striae (in contrast to deeply punctate-striate elytra in Paniegena); (7) lobed tarsomeres 1–2 (in contrast to feebly developed or absent lobation on the tarsomere 2 in Chondria); (8) anterior pronotal angles widely rounded and distinctly projecting anteriad (in contrast to acute anterior pronotal angles in Tragoscelis); (9) symmetrical antennal club (asymmetrical antennal club in Ectomychus); (10) comparatively long lateral sulci and basal sulcus without oval pit on each side (in contrast to short lateral sulci and basal sulcus with oval pits in Perrisina); (11) sutural stria discernible in posterior two-third of elytron and ovoid terminal antennomere with rounded apex (elytra with complete sutural striae and antennomere 11 obliquely truncate apically in extinct Mesozoic Cretostenotarsus). The non-modified antennomere 9 (not enlarged, toothed or excavate) could be interpreted either character of female sex of the specimen or probable absence of sexually dimorphic antennal structure in Eocene representatives of the genus.

Published as part of Alekseev, Vitalii & Tomaszewska, Wioletta, 2025, A new handsome fungus beetle of the subfamily Endomychinae (Coccinelloidea: Endomychidae) from Baltic amber of the Sambian Peninsula, pp. 577-584 in Zootaxa 5692 (3) on page 578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5692.3.9, http://zenodo.org/record/17323331

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Danae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Endomychidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green