
This review investigates the pervasive rise of administrative authoritarianism in universities across developing nations. The study analyzes how institutional heads—such as deans, chairpersons, and administrators—have shifted from their legitimate facilitative roles to dictatorial control, undermining academic autonomy and innovation. Drawing on historical context, theoretical frameworks, and empirical evidence from UNESCO, OECD, and the Global Observatory on Academic Freedom, it highlights the structural, political, and cultural origins of this dysfunction. Evidence from South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East reveals how bureaucratic dominance degrades academic quality, research freedom, and institutional morale. The review concludes with recommendations to restore shared governance, servant leadership, and respect for academic self-determination.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
