Overview: This polemical preprint publicly "stress-tests" the author's socio-economic interpretation of the Great Pyramids – "Process as the Goal" (PaC). Anticipating potential criticism, the author identifies 10 key doubts likely to be raised by skeptics and provides evidence-based answers to each. Central Claim: The central claim is a reversal of the traditional hierarchy, positing that the primary goal was not the finished pyramid, but the construction process itself. This process functioned as a deliberately planned, state-driven tool for executing a national economic development strategy, maintaining an extensive social welfare program, and integrating society after the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt. Key Issues Addressed:1) Resolving the "efficiency paradox."2) The issue of anachronism in applying modern economic and psychological analogies.3) Symbolic tombs of the 4th Dynasty: argumentation based on converging evidence (the Hetepheres precedent, absence of inscriptions, the state of research on micro-traces).4) The role of religion as a legitimizing "operating system."5) Methods for measuring intangible social benefits (stability, integration).6) The reasons for the phasing out of the pyramid-building program as proof of its success (strategic maturity).7) The resilience of the PaC theory even assuming the pyramids were actual tombs.8) The theory's methodology: a hypothetico-deductive approach.9) Avoiding the false religion-vs-economy dichotomy through a hierarchy of causality.10) Why pragmatic state objectives rarely appear in official, public narratives. Position in the series: This paper supplements and continues the author’s prior Zenodo preprints that introduce, expand, and empirically reinforce the PaC model. It is intended to invite rigorous scholarly debate and make the internal logic and resilience of the model transparent. Related works:– Krzysztoń, J. (2025). The Great Pyramids of Egypt – Tombs or Primarily a Socio-Economic Development Project? DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15858488– Krzysztoń, J. (2025). 30 Pieces of Evidence Supporting Jacek Krzysztoń’s Theory on the Socio-Economic Purpose Behind the Building of the Great Pyramids in Egypt. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16732277– Krzysztoń, J. (2025). Why Did Ancient Egypt Stop Building Great Pyramids – The Evolution of a Tool of Power and Economy. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15979657