
Generative AI writing assistants are increasingly present in higher education and promise to augment English as a Foreign Language (EFL) academic writing by providing rapid scaffolding across idea generation, organization, language accuracy, and cohesion. This article synthesizes cognitive and sociocognitive theories of writing with emerging evidence on human–AI collaboration to articulate a practice-ready model in which AI acts as a dynamic, feedback-rich partner during prewriting, drafting, revising, and reflecting. A quasi-experimental evaluation blueprint is outlined, emphasizing rubric-anchored ratings, automated discourse indices, process analytics, and learner-reported self-regulation and ethical use.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
