
This overview synthesizes practitioner research, Google guidance, and industry studies to compare link-building dynamics in large English-speaking markets (e.g., US/UK) versus smaller non-English-speaking markets (e.g., Sweden/Norway). Foundational work by Brin & Page (1998) established PageRank as a core ranking mechanism, while later studies (TrustRank, 2004; Web Spam Taxonomy, 2005) emphasized the risks of manipulation. Google’s own policies (Google, 2023; Illyes, 2023) confirm that links remain a ranking signal but are no longer among the top three signals. (A statement that is largely questioned by the industry). Industry studies (Perficient, 2023; Ahrefs, 2023, 2025) find measurable associations between link measures and rankings. Nordic research (Karlsson et al., 2015; Sjøvaag et al., 2019) shows a weak external linking culture, which affects digital PR and link bait effectiveness.
Seo, Marketing, FOS: Economics and business, Link building, Computer science
Seo, Marketing, FOS: Economics and business, Link building, Computer science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
