
handle: 10481/107064
Abstract: This systematic review examines OpenAlex, focusing on its technical features and its applications within science studies and scientific information sources. The paper offers a critical perspective on OpenAlex’s role in democratizing and promoting equity in access to scientific information. A total of 146 articles published between 2022 and 2025 are analyzed and classified by functionality and application, including AI-based validation processes. Findings reveal the rapid adoption of OpenAlex as an open alternative to commercial databases, particularly across the Global South. However, notable metadata limitations—especially regarding affiliations, languages, and document types—still affect analytical reliability. The study highlights key opportunities and challenges for researchers, libraries, institutions, and the technical community, emphasizing the need for complementary validation and responsible assessment strategies.
Maria Veronica Forchino carried out this research with funding from the 2025 International Postdoctoral Mobility Call, between institutions belonging to the Ibero-American University Association for Postgraduate Studies (AUIP), as part of “Action Line 3: Mobility Grants for Postgraduate Studies” of the AUIP 2024-2026 Action Plan. Junta de Andalucía.
Ibero-American University Association for Postgraduate Studies AUIP 2024-2026
Junta de Andalucía
systematic review, Bibliometrics, Global South, openalex,, OpenAlex
systematic review, Bibliometrics, Global South, openalex,, OpenAlex
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
