
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the confession provisions under the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 and the Bhartiye Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023. The study highlights the similarities, differences, and implications of these provisions on the judicial process in India. The paper examines the legal interpretations, the impact of recent legislative changes, and the effectiveness of these provisions in ensuring justice. Critical analysis is conducted to identify areas where improvements can be made, with suggestions for legislative and judicial reforms. Relevant case laws are discussed to provide practical insights into the application of these provisions.
Confession, Indian Evidence Act, Bhartiye Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Judicial Process, Legal Interpretation, Legislative Reform, Justice, Case Law, Criminal Procedure, Indian Law.
Confession, Indian Evidence Act, Bhartiye Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Judicial Process, Legal Interpretation, Legislative Reform, Justice, Case Law, Criminal Procedure, Indian Law.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
