
The open access movement has achieved remarkable progress over two decades, reaching over 50% of research articles and conference papers by 2023. Yet we now face a new challenge: growth is slowing, and the remaining transition appears more complex than the progress achieved so far. This position paper acknowledges an uncomfortable tension: any solutions we can hypothesise today feel uncertain because we face problems that operate at different scales, require different types of interventions, and exceed any single organisation's capacity to solve. Feedback from OASPA stakeholders has identified key priorities including removing barriers so all scholars worldwide can publish and share openly, enabling open access for every subject area, and enabling scholarly communication between speakers of different languages. These priorities share a fundamental thread: they concern participation and go beyond the long-standing focus on access. OASPA's role in this context is not to prescribe solutions, but to create the conditions needed for diverse stakeholders to work through uncertainty together. This requires honesty about what we don't know, transparency about constraints, experimentation and learning, recognition of diverse and contextually-relevant approaches, and attention to how open access is achieved and who can engage and benefit. __________ Please note: This Zenodo record includes two versions of the same document, one of which is presented in black and white.
This project is funded by the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA).
Open Access Publishing/trends, Open Access Publishing, Open Access Publishing/organization & administration, Open Access Publishing/organization & administration
Open Access Publishing/trends, Open Access Publishing, Open Access Publishing/organization & administration, Open Access Publishing/organization & administration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
