Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF KINESIO TAPING AND LOW-DYE TAPING FOR PLANTAR FASCIITIS: A TWO-WEEK RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Authors: Meraj Nabi Siddiqui;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF KINESIO TAPING AND LOW-DYE TAPING FOR PLANTAR FASCIITIS: A TWO-WEEK RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Abstract

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a prevalent source of heel pain linked to mechanical overload and faulty foot biomechanics. Taping is commonly used to offload the plantar fascia, yet head-to-head evidence comparing Kinesio taping (KT) with Low-Dye taping (LDT) is limited. Objective: To compare short-term effects of KT and LDT—each combined with iontophoresis and stretching—on pain, stiffness, and function in adults with PF. Methods: Forty-five participants (21–60 years; 14 females/31 males) meeting standard PF criteria were randomized into three groups (n=15/group): KT, LDT or control. All groups received 12 sessions over two weeks (6/week) KT and LDT groups received taping plus acetic-acid iontophoresis (40 mA·min, up to 4 mA) and plantar fascia/calf stretching; controls received iontophoresis + stretching only. Outcomes were Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, VAS morning stiffness (MS) and VAS residual stiffness (RS) recorded at baseline, 1 week and 2 weeks. Statistics: paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons (α=0.05). Results: All groups improved significantly within-group on most outcomes over 2 weeks (p ≤ 0.05). Between-group ANOVA showed significant differences favouring taping groups for PSFS at 2 weeks (F=6.67, p=0.03) and VAS-pain at 1 week (F=14.83, p<0.001) and 2 weeks (F=13.05, p<0.001). Between-group differences were not significant for MS at 2 weeks (p=0.12) or RS at 2 weeks (p=0.34) Post-hoc analyses indicated KT ≈ LDT (no significant difference) while each outperformed control on pain and function. Minor tape-related skin irritation occurred in a few participants. Conclusion: Over two weeks both KT and LDT—when combined with iontophoresis and stretching—yield superior short-term improvements in pain and function versus iontophoresis + stretching alone. KT and LDT were clinically comparable in this timeframe.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Kinesio Taping, Plantar Fasciitis, Stretching, Iontophoresis, Low-Dye Taping, Plantar Fascia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green