Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Screening of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) Guidelines in Tertiary Care Center

Authors: Dr Phanjamuthi Baro;

Screening of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) Guidelines in Tertiary Care Center

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as carbohydrate intolerance first recognized during pregnancy, irrespective of the treatment with diet or insulin. High blood sugar during pregnancy poses risks to both the mother and fetus, necessitating effective screening and management. DIPSI Recommends a non-fasting 75g oral glucose challenge test, diagnosing GDM if 2hour blood glucose is ≥ 140 mg/dl. This costeffective single step approach enhances screening accessibility, particularly in resource limited settings. Methodology: A prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of DIPSI guidelines in screening of GDM and assessing maternal-fetal outcome. Results: The incidence of GDM in our study was 9.6 % by using 75 gm OGTT (DIPSI) and 7% by using standard 100 gm OGTT (Carpenter and Coustan). Most cases were in age group 25 to 29 years (30.8%). Higher gravidity (gravida ≥3, 12.5%) and BMI ≥30kg/m2 (50% positive) correlated with GDM risk. Family history of diabetes increased positivity (23.3%). Maternal complication included gestational hypertension (56.3%) and polyhydramnios (43.8%). Among 23 DIPSI positive cases 95.6% had LSCS and 4.4% had vaginal delivery. Respiratory Distress was the most common neonatal complications among the subjects, followed by hyperbilirubinaemia and hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: DIPSI, single step OGTT is economical, feasible and tailored for Indian populations, improving early detection and reducing complications. Its simplicity enhances compliance, making it crucial for GDM management in diverse healthcare settings.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green