Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Governance, Ethics, and Transparency: A Comparative Analysis of Takaful and Conventional Insurance in Malaysia

Authors: RESDO;

Governance, Ethics, and Transparency: A Comparative Analysis of Takaful and Conventional Insurance in Malaysia

Abstract

The insurance industry is a main part of both affecting financial stability and economic resilience, and its models are highly disparate from an ethical and operationally oriented point of view. In a duopoly financial system of two types of financial instruments (Malaysia has mainly conventional insurance, while Malaysia has Islamic insurance (Takaful)), the issue here is related to compliance, governance, and transparency, which contribute to the evaluation of their performance. This paper contributes a comparative analysis between Takaful insurance and conventional insurance between 2016 and 2024 with regard to governance structures, ethical behavior and compliance, financial disclosure, and consumer protection. Using a mixed methods approach, which combines thematic analysis of governance structures and quantitative analysis using an Insurance Disclosure Score and a Comparative Ethics Index, this study compares and contrasts the capabilities of each model to address the liability of stakeholders and regulatory imperatives. The findings indicate that while the disclosures of both systems satisfy minimum governance subsurface, Takaful providers are otherwise more ethical than insurers in ethics-related disclosures, the disclosures on the operating model, and consumer protection due to the existence of double jurisdiction and Shariah supervisor. On the contrary side, conventional insurers, inflamed by no unfamiliar corporate banking, have as a rule more reserve power in monetary inclusion and regularity of expressions, and enjoy a superior institutional foundation and normalized methodologies for regulations. Results indicate that Takaful blends a religious mandate and ethical values in the governance culture, whereas conventional insurance places more emphasis on the financial performance, as well as being transparent to citizens and investors. From the findings, it is concluded that the dual financial system in Malaysia supports the presence of these two models. However, it requires more alignment in Shariah standards, more consumer disclosures, and creative regulatory solutions for sustainability and transparency, inclusiveness, and resilience of the industry.

Keywords

Takaful, Conventional Insurance, Governance, Ethical Compliance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green