Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 7) - AI at the Crossroads: A Practitioner's Guide To Community-Centered Solutions

Authors: Butalid, Renjie; Wright, Connor; Kherroubi Garcia, Ismael;

The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 7) - AI at the Crossroads: A Practitioner's Guide To Community-Centered Solutions

Abstract

This is not another framework or productivity analysis. SAIER Volume 7 is a snapshot from our vantage point, bringing together practitioners, researchers, advocates, and communities grappling with AI's realities on the ground. It captures perspectives from Canada, the US, Europe, Asia, and Africa, though we recognize many voices remain absent. We hope it generates more questions than it answers and encourages people from all walks of life to ask hard questions and be critical. It also reflects our entrepreneurial roots at the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI), less interested in abstract principles and more focused on what's actually happening in the field. What does implementation look like? What's working? What's failing? Where are the gaps between policy rhetoric and lived experience? We ground our work in understanding AI as sociotechnical systems. This means recognizing the technical components (software, hardware, data centres, chips), the social dimensions (people, culture, values, organizations), and the environmental impacts. Ignoring these interconnected realities reduces AI governance to compliance checklists when the real challenges are about trust, power, and lived impacts. We're also humble enough to know we're not capturing everything. Regions remain underrepresented. This isn’t the definitive state of AI ethics. It’s a state of AI ethics, from where we sit, in 2025. AI ethics, fundamentally, is a process and not a destination. This volume is our contribution to this ongoing conversation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities