Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TESTAREA CU UTILIZAREA POLIGRAFULUI: 10 ANI DE APLICARE PRACTICĂ

POLYGRAPH TESTING: 10 YEARS OF PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Authors: DONCENCO, Igor;

TESTAREA CU UTILIZAREA POLIGRAFULUI: 10 ANI DE APLICARE PRACTICĂ

Abstract

Articolul dat reprezintă o analiză a evoluției și eficienței testării cu utilizarea poligrafului în Republica Moldova pe parcursul unui deceniu de aplicare instituțională (2014–2023) în cadrul Centrului tehnico-criminalistic și expertize judiciare al Inspectoratului General al Poliției. În cadrul articolului sunt prezentate date cantitative relevante privind frecvența testărilor și tipurile de solicitări, demonstrând o acuratețe ridicată și o aplicabilitate practică semnificativă. Pentru evaluarea impactului real al metodei, rezultatele obținute prin testare au fost comparate cu hotărârile judecătorești, iar utilizarea poligrafului a fost analizată din multiple perspective. De asemenea, este abordată situația și statutul aplicării testărilor cu utilizarea poligrafului în Republica Moldova, SUA, România și Ucraina. Prin prisma experienței acumulate, se poate constata că testarea poligraf contribuie eficient la clarificarea unor cazuri complexe și, în anumite situații, permite obținerea unor informații relevante suplimentare. Concluziile subliniază relevanța testării poligraf ca instrument complementar de investigare, evidențiind totodată necesitatea dezvoltării continue a domeniului prin perfecționarea profesională a specialiștilor, armonizarea cadrului normativ și extinderea domeniului de aplicare în condiții de rigoare științifică și etică instituțională.

The article analyzes the evolution and effectiveness of polygraph testing in the Republic of Moldova over a decade of institutional application (2014–2023) within the Forensic and Judicial Expertise Center of the General Police Inspectorate. Relevant quantitative data are presented concerning the frequency of polygraph tests and the types of requests received, highlighting a high degree of accuracy and significant practical applicability. In order to assess the actual impact of the method, , the test results were compared with court rulings, and the use of polygraph was examined from multiple perspectives. The article also addresses the current status and implementation of polygraph testing in the Republic of Moldova, United States of America, Romania, and Ukraine. Based on the gathered experience, it can be concluded that polygraph testing effectively contributes to the clarification of complex cases and, in certain situations, enables the retrieval of additional relevant information.The conclusions emphasize the relevance of the polygraph as a complementary investigative tool, while also underscoring the need for continuous development of the field through advanced professional training, regulatory harmonization, and the expansion of its application under scientifically rigorous and ethically responsible conditions.

Keywords

poligraf, testare cu utilizarea poligrafului, detector al comportamentului simulat, investigarea infracțiunilor, selectarea personalului, hotărâri judecătorești, centrul tehnico-criminalistic și expertize judiciare.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green