
This talk explores how female scientists experience writing for science communication in the digital environment. I will begin by outlining the innovative research design that enabled the exploration of these digital writing experiences from the unique perspectives of women in science. Drawing on three compelling case studies, I will then illustrate how these scientists actively claim their expertise by crafting new genres. They use these digital forms to highlight research that traditional publication practices often obscure. This discussion will also offer insights into the specific training needs of early career female scientists such as digital multimodal composing skills, writing processes, and digital literacies.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
