Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Weekly Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Authors: Sourav Paul; Juhi;

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Weekly Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains a significant therapeutic challenge, with standard treatment involving concurrent chemoradiation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before chemoradiation may improve tumor shrinkage, facilitate better local control, and reduce distant metastasis. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with LACC. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over a period of one year at R G Kar Medical College. A total of 80 patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2 to IIIB) were enrolled. Key study variables included patient age, FIGO stage, tumor histology, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation. Treatment response was assessed using clinical and radiological parameters, while toxicity was monitored and graded according to standard criteria. Outcomes measured included tumor response, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: The study included 80 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, predominantly FIGO stage IIB and squamous cell carcinoma. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel, 85% of patients achieved an overall response (30% complete, 55% partial). Tumor size significantly decreased from 5.4 cm to 3.2 cm (p < 0.001). The treatment was well tolerated, with manageable hematological and nonhematological toxicities. At 12 months follow-up, progression-free survival was 72.5%, and overall survival was 85%. Patients with complete or partial response had significantly better survival outcomes than those with stable or progressive disease (PFS: 14 vs. 8 months, p = 0.002; OS: 18 vs. 11 months, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiation is feasible and well tolerated in LACC patients, with encouraging early clinical response and survival outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of this sequential approach compared to chemoradiation alone. 

Abstract Introduction: Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains a significant therapeutic challenge, with standard treatment involving concurrent chemoradiation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before chemoradiation may improve tumor shrinkage, facilitate better local control, and reduce distant metastasis. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with LACC. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over a period of one year at R G Kar Medical College. A total of 80 patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2 to IIIB) were enrolled. Key study variables included patient age, FIGO stage, tumor histology, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation. Treatment response was assessed using clinical and radiological parameters, while toxicity was monitored and graded according to standard criteria. Outcomes measured included tumor response, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: The study included 80 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, predominantly FIGO stage IIB and squamous cell carcinoma. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel, 85% of patients achieved an overall response (30% complete, 55% partial). Tumor size significantly decreased from 5.4 cm to 3.2 cm (p < 0.001). The treatment was well tolerated, with manageable hematological and nonhematological toxicities. At 12 months follow-up, progression-free survival was 72.5%, and overall survival was 85%. Patients with complete or partial response had significantly better survival outcomes than those with stable or progressive disease (PFS: 14 vs. 8 months, p = 0.002; OS: 18 vs. 11 months, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiation is feasible and well tolerated in LACC patients, with encouraging early clinical response and survival outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of this sequential approach compared to chemoradiation alone. 

Keywords

Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Chemoradiation, Clinical Response, Toxicity., Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Chemoradiation, Clinical Response, Toxicity.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research