Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AI Chernobyl and the Collapse of Civilization: Diagnosing and Rebuilding the Architecture of Trust

Authors: Kim, Yoochul;

AI Chernobyl and the Collapse of Civilization: Diagnosing and Rebuilding the Architecture of Trust

Abstract

AI Chernobyl and the Collapse of Civilization: Diagnosing and Rebuilding the Architecture of Trust is a philosophical inquiry into the systemic fragility of modern civilization under the impact of artificial intelligence. Drawing on the works of Heidegger, Jonas, and Arendt, this paper introduces the concept of an “AI Chernobyl”—a metaphor for the cumulative collapse of epistemic trust caused by algorithmic systems that erode authenticity, accountability, and shared meaning. The study diagnoses five dimensions of “civilizational breakdown” in the age of AI: epistemic corruption, moral desynchronization, institutional automation, narrative fragmentation, and collective nihilism. It proposes a philosophical framework for rebuilding the architecture of trust through five normative principles—Radical Verifiability, Distributed Sovereignty, Epistemic Integrity, Emergent Governance, and Systemic Resilience. Methodologically, the work bridges philosophy of technology, ethics, and systems theory, combining scenario analysis with hermeneutic reflection. Conceptually, it shifts the discourse from the technical control of AI to the existential reconstruction of civilization’s ethical foundations. The paper aims to contribute to ongoing discussions in AI ethics, existential risk, and political philosophy by reframing the challenge of artificial intelligence not as a technological threat alone, but as a crisis of meaning, truth, and trust at the core of human civilization.

Keywords

Hermeneutics, Ethics of Information, Hans Jonas, Epistemic Collapse, Artificial Intelligence, Technological Civilization, Philosophy of Technology, Heidegger, Civilizational Risk, AI Ethics, Hannah Arendt

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities