Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D1.1 State of the Art and end-user needs review

Authors: Delft University of Technology;

D1.1 State of the Art and end-user needs review

Abstract

This deliverable, is the direct output of Task 1.1 of the project. It aims to review the state-of-the-art in each component utilized in the PHOEBE Framework, and gain a deeper understanding of the needs of cities and transport planners. The task had three distinct components: Review of the state-of-the-art to document the body of knowledge available (in terms of both research and practice) for each component of the PHOEBE Framework to be developed, and draw conclusions about the potential implications to be taken into account in the design of this framework, in particular the methodological framework and technical components. Online stakeholder survey to understand the needs and gaps in current practice among the stakeholders involved in the PHOEBE use cases (Athens, Valencia, West Midlands), as well as a broader groups of transport managers reachable through the wide network of contacts of the project partners. Focus group consultations to drill more deeply into the current uses and practices of road safety assessment and microscopic simulation on urban road networks, and the extent to which they inform decision making in urban road planning and management. The online stakeholder survey and focus group consultations captured the current gaps and needs from the perspective of transport managers and municipalities (the intended end users of the PHOEBE Framework). These are synthesised into a user needs statement to inform the design of the PHOEBE Framework’s end-user tools and knowledge products.

Keywords

Road safety

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green