
Detecting anomalies in large-scale network traffic is one of the pressing issues in modern information security. The volume of traffic generated as a result of the expansion of Internet services, cloud computing, the development of IoT and 5G networks is increasing dramatically, and this process reduces the effectiveness of traditional security mechanisms. This article studies and compares statistical methods and machine learning (ML) approaches to detect anomalous behavior in the network. The advantages of statistical approaches, including Z-score, Chebyshev inequality, analysis of variance and time series models, are explained by their fast performance and efficiency in real-time monitoring, but their accuracy is limited in large-scale data. Machine learning methods (Random Forest, SVM, Neural networks, K-means, DBSCAN, Autoencoder) provide high accuracy and flexibility, but they are computationally intensive. The results of the study show that a hybrid approach - integrating statistical and ML methods - can significantly increase efficiency.
autoencoder, Network traffic analysis, big data, IoT security, cloud computing, hybrid model, unsupervised learning, real-time monitoring, supervised learning, anomaly detection, statistical approaches, post-quantum cryptography, 5G networks
autoencoder, Network traffic analysis, big data, IoT security, cloud computing, hybrid model, unsupervised learning, real-time monitoring, supervised learning, anomaly detection, statistical approaches, post-quantum cryptography, 5G networks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
