
Ushbu maqola O‘zbekiston Respublikasi huquqiy tizimidagi vasiylik va homiylik institutining o‘rni va ahamiyatiga bag‘ishlangan bo‘lib, uning huquqiy-nazariy asoslari va amaliyotdagi muammolariga keng qamrovli tahlilni taqdim etadi. Tadqiqotda normativ-huquqiy, qiyosiy-huquqiy va sotsial-huquqiy tahlil usullari qo‘llanilib, Fuqarolik kodeksida belgilangan progressiv normalar bilan amaliyotdagi sust nazorat, past huquqiy savodxonlik va zaif ijro mexanizmlari o‘rtasidagi nomuvofiqliklar o‘rganilgan. Maqolada xorijiy davlatlar, jumladan, AQSh, Germaniya va Rossiya tajribasi tahlil qilinadi hamda bu tajribaga asoslangan holda tizimdagi kamchiliklarni bartaraf etishga qaratilgan amaliy yechimlar ishlab chiqilgan. Takliflar orasida vasiy va homiylarni tayinlashdan oldin chuqur tekshiruv va majburiy malaka oshirish kurslarini joriy etish, elektron monitoring tizimini yaratish hamda nazorat organlarining salohiyatini oshirish kabi chora-tadbirlar mavjud. Maqola vasiylik va homiylik tizimining samaradorligini oshirish, shu orqali himoyaga muhtoj fuqarolarning huquq va manfaatlarini to‘liq himoya qilishga erishish zarurligini asoslaydi.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
