
ABSTRACT For low-income areas, biogas technology offers a long-term answer to the problems of energy poverty and environmental damage. Sustainable energy for cooking was the focus of this research. A pliable HDPE chamber served as the system's primary housing, and it was fitted with an organic biomass intake, an effluent discharge outlet, and a gas output that linked to a simple three-stage purification unit made up of water, silica gel, and iron sponge. Under batch digestion settings, three kinds of organic feedstock were subjected to anaerobic digestion: cow dung, cassava residues (fufu and garri), and fruit waste. Due to its consistent methanogenic activity and balanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (25:1), cow dung produced the most biogas (430 ± 2.0 L/kg VS) out of all the substrates evaluated during a 34-day hydraulic retention time (HRT). The acidification, as shown by a decrease in pH from 6.88 to 6.78, was the main cause of the fruit waste producing the lowest yield (200 ± 5.0 L/kg VS). Using sandbag ballast, the system was able to keep the pressure stable (0.15-0.25 Bar) while operating under passive solar heating (29-32°C). Gas leakage was limited, at less than 2%. Greenhouse gas emissions might be reduced by 2.1 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent each year, and the method could help slow down deforestation by 1.5 metric tons per family per year. Although there is a lack of long- term testing and methane quantification, the technology nevertheless provides a good way to produce clean energy decentralized in areas with limited resources. Keywords: Anaerobic digestion, Biogas production, Cassava residues, Cow dung, Fruit waste, Renewable energy
Anaerobic digestion, Biogas production, Cassava residues, Cow dung, Fruit waste, Renewable energy
Anaerobic digestion, Biogas production, Cassava residues, Cow dung, Fruit waste, Renewable energy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
