Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pelvic floor dysfunction after childbirth: A systematic review of prevalence and associated risk factors Breadcrumb

Authors: Hagawane, Komal; Sinha, Ishani; Zeeshan, Zeeshan;

Pelvic floor dysfunction after childbirth: A systematic review of prevalence and associated risk factors Breadcrumb

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a prevalent issue that significantly impacts women's health and overall quality of life, often resulting from factors such as childbirth, anatomical changes, and lifestyle choices. Despite its widespread occurrence, both awareness and effective treatment options remain insufficient. Objective: This study aims to systematically review existing literature regarding the prevalence, risk factors, outcomes, and conservative treatment options for PFD in women. Methods: A total of thirty-one peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2025 were examined. The study designs encompassed randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies, with participant numbers ranging from 40 to 3,000. Results: The findings indicated that vaginal delivery is consistently linked to a higher incidence of PFD compared to cesarean delivery. The risk of developing PFD was found to increase with perineal injury, elevated body mass index (BMI), advancing age, and imbalances in vaginal microflora. Weakness in pelvic floor muscles (PFM) was strongly associated with incontinence and dyspareunia. Conservative treatment methods, particularly pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), biofeedback, and the use of pessaries, demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating symptoms, although caution was advised for early implementation. The psychological effects, including issues related to body image and diminished quality of life, were significant yet often overlooked. Awareness of PFD was notably low among various populations, underscoring the necessity for improved education and early screening initiatives. Imaging and biometric assessment tools were found to be effective for clinical evaluation. Additionally, cultural and regional variations highlighted the importance of personalized care approaches. Conclusion: PFD is a complex condition with enduring effects on women's health. Key contributing factors include the mode of delivery, trauma, and muscle function. Individualized conservative management strategies can enhance patient outcomes. Increased awareness, timely intervention, and culturally appropriate care are crucial for addressing this condition effectively.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Risk factors, Women's health, Pelvic floor muscle training, Vaginal delivery, Pelvic floor dysfunction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green