
Aim of the study: This study aimed to measure the level of knowledge of nursing students about first aid and compare the differences between second-and-third years students. Assessing this knowledge is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of their education, and identifying areas for improvement need. Methodology: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at the Faculty of Technical Medical Sciences, University of Elbasan, Albania. A structured questionnaire, adapted cross-culturally, was used to assess students' knowledge related first-aid. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.0. Results: The findings indicate that 93.5% of students had previously heard about first aid. We noticed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002) in self-reported knowledge between second-year (99%) and third-year students (88%). Fracture-related first aid was the topic with the highest correct answers rate, while the management of bites had the lowest correct responses rate. A significant correlation (p = 0.015) was found between prior knowledge and overall first-aid student competence. The majority of the students showed moderate first-aid knowledge. The exposure to first-aid information was the key factor of their knowledge. Conclusions: These results highlight the need for universities to integrate more comprehensive training programs. To explore first aid knowledge and attitudes among diverse educational and community settings, further study is required.
Knowledge, First aid, Nursing students, Education
Knowledge, First aid, Nursing students, Education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
