Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluación de la calidad percibida, la satisfacción y la lealtad con los Servicios de Biblioteca en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid para el periodo 2023/24: Informe Técnico. Madrid

Authors: Martínez-Molina, Agustín; Shih Ma, Pei-Chun; Olmos Albacete, Ricardo;

Evaluación de la calidad percibida, la satisfacción y la lealtad con los Servicios de Biblioteca en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid para el periodo 2023/24: Informe Técnico. Madrid

Abstract

This technical report presents the results of the EBA-UAM project (Evaluation of Library Services at Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) for the academic year 2023/24. Using the EBA-7 instrument, developed from earlier versions since 2010, the study assessed perceived quality, satisfaction, and loyalty among 867 users (undergraduate, postgraduate students, and faculty). The measurement model included three specific factors (staff attention, facilities, and resources), as well as general perceived quality and loyalty. Confirmatory bifactorial models showed the best fit, replicating prior evaluations. Overall, service quality was rated as “very good,” with particularly high scores for staff attention. Faculty consistently rated services higher than students, and minor differences were found across libraries, mainly in facilities and staff-related aspects. Compared with the 2019/20 evaluation, perceived quality remained stable or slightly improved. The report highlights psychometric robustness of EBA-7, identifies strengths and weaknesses, and provides recommendations for continuous improvement in library services.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Public libraries, Perceived Quality, Factor Analysis, Statistical

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green