
In a continent plagued by violent conflicts, the emergence of non-state security actors has become a significant phenomenon, particularly in Nigeria's Borno State, where the Boko Haram insurgency has severely strained formal security institutions. While these volunteer groups, like the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), have played a critical role in complementing government counter-insurgency efforts, their rise has created a dual security threat for civilians. This study, therefore, explores the nature, causes, and consequences of human rights abuses by these groups in Borno State. The study adopted a mixed-methods research design, using both quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (KIIs and FGDs) approaches. Data were collected from a purposively selected sample of 377 respondents in three significantly affected LGAs: Bama, Monguno, and Gwoza. The findings revealed that NSVGs emerged as a community-driven response to the state's failure to provide adequate security, driven by a need to protect against persistent Boko Haram attacks. However, their involvement in human rights abuses was primarily caused by a complex combination of factors, including a lack of formal oversight and accountability mechanisms, coupled with a perception among members of being above the law. The study concludes that while these groups are a vital protective hedge for communities, their lack of regulation and oversight has led to widespread abuses, including arbitrary arrests and extrajudicial killings. Therefore, the study recommends that the government urgently implement strict oversight mechanisms, clear rules of engagement, and continuous human rights training for all NSVG members to ensure accountability and restore public trust.
Non-State Security Actors, Human Rights Abuses, Boko Haram Insurgency, Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), Borno State
Non-State Security Actors, Human Rights Abuses, Boko Haram Insurgency, Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), Borno State
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
