
This investigation presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of negative specific heat phenomena manifested in two fundamentally distinct astrophysical systems: black holes and stellarclusters. Through rigorous theoretical examination and synthesis of contemporary observationalevidence, we elucidate the underlying physical mechanisms governing negative heat capacity inthese systems. Our analysis reveals that black holes exhibit negative specific heat through quantumthermodynamic processes at the event horizon, as described by the Bekenstein-Hawking formulation and Hawking radiation theory. Conversely, stellar clusters demonstrate this phenomenonvia classical gravitational thermodynamics and the gravothermal catastrophe. While both systemsexhibit similar thermodynamic behavior, the fundamental physics, characteristic timescales, andobservational manifestations differ substantially. Black holes demonstrate quantum-mechanicalnegative heat capacity with timescales exceeding the age of the universe, whereas stellar clustersexhibit classical negative heat capacity observable on galactic evolutionary timescales. Thesefindings contribute significantly to our understanding of gravitational thermodynamics, stellardynamics, and the fundamental nature of entropy in gravitational systems, with implicationsextending to quantum gravity, cosmology, and the thermal evolution of astrophysical structures.
virial theorem, black hole thermodynamics, negative specific heat, Black holes, Hawking radiation, gravothermal catastrophe, stellar clusters
virial theorem, black hole thermodynamics, negative specific heat, Black holes, Hawking radiation, gravothermal catastrophe, stellar clusters
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
