
Technology has become a central force in reshaping the study of English language and literature. In earlier times, teaching and learning English relied mainly on printed books, face-to-face classroom lectures, and handwritten notes. Today, the presence of digital platforms, online libraries, e-learning tools, and multimedia resources has changed this traditional model. Technology supports learners in developing communication skills, provides access to global literature, and helps teachers adopt new and interactive teaching methods. At the same time, researchers benefit from digital databases, text-mining software, and virtual archives that simplify academic work. Literature itself has expanded beyond the printed page, giving rise to e-poetry, hypertext fiction, blogs, and audiobooks, which show the creative potential of technology in modern culture. Furthermore, digitization preserves old manuscripts and translation tools enable cross-cultural sharing of literary texts. However, technology also presents challenges such as distraction, plagiarism, reduced critical reading, and unequal access among students. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of technology in English studies, highlighting how a balanced approach can make technology a valuable partner without overshadowing traditional reading and critical thinking. Ultimately, technology enriches both language learning and literature by making them more accessible, interactive, and globally relevant.
Digital Humanities, Technology, Digital Learning, Language Education, English Literature
Digital Humanities, Technology, Digital Learning, Language Education, English Literature
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
