Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Сравнительный анализ кабельных и оптических решений для фидеров и магистралей

Comparative analysis of cable and optical solutions for feeders and mains

Сравнительный анализ кабельных и оптических решений для фидеров и магистралей

Abstract

В статье проводится всесторонний сравнительный анализ традиционных кабельных (медных) и современных оптических (волоконно-оптических) решений, применяемых для построения фидерных линий и магистралей в различных телекоммуникационных и энергетических сетях. Исследование охватывает ключевые технические, экономические и эксплуатационные аспекты, определяющие выбор той или иной технологии для конкретных сценариев применения. Особое внимание уделяется таким параметрам, как пропускная способность, дальность передачи сигнала без ретрансляции, устойчивость к помехам (электромагнитным и радиочастотным), безопасность передачи данных, а также стоимость развертывания и обслуживания инфраструктуры. Анализируются преимущества и недостатки каждого решения в контексте современных требований к высокоскоростной передаче данных, надежности и масштабируемости сетей.

This article provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of traditional cable (copper) and modern optical (fiber-optic) solutions used to build feeder lines and highways in various telecommunications and energy networks. The study covers the key technical, economic and operational aspects that determine the choice of a particular technology for specific application scenarios. Special attention is paid to such parameters as bandwidth, signal transmission range without retransmission, resistance to interference (electromagnetic and radio frequency), data transmission security, as well as the cost of infrastructure deployment and maintenance. The advantages and disadvantages of each solution are analyzed in the context of modern requirements for high-speed data transmission, reliability and scalability of networks.

Keywords

фидерные линии, медные кабели, пропускная способность, волоконно-оптические линии связи (ВОЛС), магистрали, оптические решения, кабельные решения

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green