
This article examined the role of committal proceedings in Tanzania criminal justice system, especially in relation to offences including murder. Although committal proceedings were intended to streamline case transfers from subordinate courts to the High Court, in realities they have become a source of delay, prolonged pre-trial detention and human rights concerns. The study provided the historical development and current legal framework under the Criminal Procedure Act, established the constitutional implications of delayed justice and evaluates case law from the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Drawing on comparative experiences from the United Kingdom, Kenya, and Australia, the paper proposes reforms. Ultimately, it provided that the current system undermines the constitutional guarantee of a fair and timely trial and calls for legislative and institutional reforms to enhance efficiency, fairness, and compliance with human rights standards.
Committal Proceedings, Criminal justice system, Pre-Trial Detention and Comparative Jurisdictions
Committal Proceedings, Criminal justice system, Pre-Trial Detention and Comparative Jurisdictions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
