Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DMAICR Problem Solving the Universe of Dark, Anomalous, Unexplained Phenomena

Authors: Holland, John;

DMAICR Problem Solving the Universe of Dark, Anomalous, Unexplained Phenomena

Abstract

Problem Solving the Universe: A DMAICR Framework Applied to Cosmology This document applies the DMAICR problem-solving methodology — Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control, Replicate — to the deepest unresolved questions in cosmology. For nearly a century, phenomena such as galaxy rotation anomalies, gravitational lensing discrepancies, late-time cosmic acceleration, the Hubble tension, neutron star glitches, and void physics have resisted explanation, despite tens of billions invested globally in dark matter, dark energy, and related constructs. The report begins by framing these anomalies as a problem statement: observational evidence consistently departs from predictions, but only in certain conditions. Through Define, Measure, and Analyse, a unifying pattern emerges — all anomalies cluster at specific density thresholds, while high-density regimes remain fully consistent with General Relativity. This recognition reframes cosmology not as a collection of independent puzzles, but as a single, structured problem. The Improve phase develops a principled resolution: a framework built from first principles that naturally explains galaxy rotation curves, late-time acceleration, void lensing, neutron star behaviour, and other anomalies without exotic particles, ad hoc fields, or mathematical patches. The Control and Replicate phases provide a catalogue of falsifiers and observational tests, ensuring the proposal remains strictly scientific, transparent, and testable. Supporting materials include: A cost analysis (1929–2025) showing ~$25–34B invested to date in unresolved anomalies (act./est. split across facilities, telescopes, space missions, and colliders). A comparison table contrasting ΛCDM, MOND, PEM, and the new framework on predictive scope, unifying power, and falsifiability. A science spring-clean cataloguing legacy constructs rendered unnecessary: dark matter, dark energy, quintessence, phantom fields, inflaton, spacetime singularities, and more. The report does not present another patch or speculative hypothesis. It is a problem-solving dossier: a disciplined pathway from anomaly recognition to unified resolution, based on evidence, first principles, and falsifiable predictions.

Keywords

Expansion, Late Time Acceleration, BAO, Inertia, Albert Einstein, Density Dependent, Physics, Gravity, Expanse Tension Theory, Density, 6-Sigma, Astrophysics, Dark Energy, Cosmology, Time, Galaxy, Universe, Galaxy Rotation, DMAICR, MOND, Dark Matter, Einstein, ETT, Hubble, United Theory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities