Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D4.2 Report on the implementation of the institutional roadmaps, lessons learned and final 4I-GEPs

Authors: Ververidou, Faye; Tatsioka, Zoi; Strid, Sofia; Wuiame, Nathalie;

D4.2 Report on the implementation of the institutional roadmaps, lessons learned and final 4I-GEPs

Abstract

This deliverable documents the second and third phases of the SUPPORTER project: the update and implementation of the institutional roadmaps, and the development of new intersectional, inclusive, innovative and impactful Gender Equality Plans (4I-GEPs). Over 16 months, the eight sports higher education institutions involved in the project leveraged knowledge gained through tailored training, collective and bilateral mutual learning, and continuous mentoring by the core team to carry out their Grounding Actions, update their roadmaps to reflect emerging needs and insights, and prepare the ground for sustainable institutional change. Guided by iterative feedback, roadmap implementation focused on raising awareness of gender+ equality, improving data collection with an intersectional approach, dedicating institutional resources, addressing gender-based violence (GBV), embedding gender into research and curricula, and promoting inclusive organisational cultures. Institutions faced challenges such as low awareness, limited resources and resistance, but adapted effectively through stakeholder engagement and ongoing support from the project’s capacity-building activities. Building on this process, each institution co-designed and formally adopted its own 4I-GEP. These new plans go beyond compliance with minimum EU requirements by explicitly mainstreaming GBV prevention and response as a core institutional priority, integrating intersectionality into data collection, awareness-raising, teaching and research, and tailoring gender equality actions to the specific realities of sports academia, where stereotypes, hierarchical structures and male-dominated leadership remain entrenched. By embedding inclusivity, innovation, intersectionality and impact into governance structures, curricula and professional training pathways, the 4I-GEPs position sports universities as frontrunners of cultural change. Together, they represent a decisive step towards sustainable transformation in sports academia and a meaningful contribution to the wider European sports ecosystem.

This project is funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe programme under grant agreement No 101094529. Disclaimer: The current version of the deliverable has not been reviewed by the EC yet. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the REA can be held responsible for them.

Keywords

Gender equality, institutional change, challenges, roadmap implementation, CEE/widening countries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities