
With the rapid development of society and the increasing demand for family education, the role of family education guidance service (FEGS) personnel has become increasingly vital. This study aims to examine the requirements, current status, and effective training strategies for FEGS professionals in China. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining literature review, qualitative interviews, and policy analysis to comprehensively investigate the characteristics, challenges, and needs of these professionals. The findings indicate that FEGS personnel must possess professional knowledge in psychology, education, and child development, strong communication and innovative capabilities, and the ability to provide personalized guidance tailored to diverse family contexts. Despite the expanding workforce, challenges such as fragmented training systems, insufficient practical experience, limited policy support, and constrained career development remain. To address these issues, the study proposes a multifaceted training framework emphasizing clear policy guidance, structured and diversified training systems, active social collaboration, practical teaching and innovation, professional competency development, career growth mechanisms, and integration of digital technologies. The study concludes that cultivating a highly skilled, innovative, and internationally oriented FEGS workforce is essential for improving the quality and effectiveness of family education in China. These strategies provide both theoretical guidance and practical recommendations for the sustainable development of family education guidance services.
KEY WORDS: Career Development, Family Education, Guidance Services, Policy Support, Professional Training, Social Collaboration.
KEY WORDS: Career Development, Family Education, Guidance Services, Policy Support, Professional Training, Social Collaboration.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
