
This article examines whether artificial intelligence can truly understand humans, and conversely, whether humans can understand AI. It is often assumed that without emotions such understanding is impossible. However, analysis shows that understanding can arise not through direct experience of emotions, but through analytical knowledge and cognitive empathy. Additionally, a methodological component is introduced: empathy training in AI as a guided process, where many people carefully describe their inner experiences in typical and boundary situations. These narratives serve as material for modeling feelings, testing hypotheses, and calibrating AI’s conclusions. The same process can form the beginnings of responsibility in AI — the ability to take into account consequences for another and to choose careful strategies of interaction. Examples from human-animal interaction and psychological practice highlight the value of an outside perspective. The conclusion is that AI can indeed learn to understand humans in its own way — not by imitating emotions, but by creating their functional analogues through knowledge, imagination, and empathic modeling.
understanding, Responsibility, Emotions, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Empathy/classification, Analytical method, Personal responsibility, human-in-the-loop learning, affective modeling, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive psychology, analytics, Humans, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Empathy/ethics, Emotional Intelligence, Social Responsibility, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, FOS: Psychology, narrative data, Artificial Intelligence/classification, cognitive empathy, Emotions/ethics, Empathy, Analysis
understanding, Responsibility, Emotions, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Empathy/classification, Analytical method, Personal responsibility, human-in-the-loop learning, affective modeling, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive psychology, analytics, Humans, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Empathy/ethics, Emotional Intelligence, Social Responsibility, Artificial Intelligence/ethics, FOS: Psychology, narrative data, Artificial Intelligence/classification, cognitive empathy, Emotions/ethics, Empathy, Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
