
Frameworks for agentic artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming popular as instruments for automating intricate processes, such as those related to academic research. Six popu- lar frameworks—AutoGen, Google ADK, CrewAI, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, and Semantic Kernel— were compared in this study, with an emphasis on their architectural features and suitabil- ity for literature processing tasks. We developed a prototype system using AutoGen to summarize preprints from arXiv to demonstrate its practical use. We analyze the interoperability of this system with other frameworks and describe how workflows are orchestrated within it. Although there are still issues with synthesis quality, citation accuracy, and scalability, our initial assessment suggests that agentic AI systems may enable wider source coverage and less manual labor in early stage literature review. The study contributes a taxonomy of framework design patterns, an initial demonstration of agentic workflows for academic tasks, and a discussion of open challenges for future research.
Agentic AI, Multi-agent systems, Large Lan- guage Models (LLMs), Academic knowledge management, Lit- erature review automation, Research automation, Document summarization, Information retrieval, ArXiv summarization, Text mining in education, Framework comparison, Workflow orchestration, Artificial Intelligence in academia, AutoGen, Cre- wAI, LangGraph, Semantic Kernel, LlamaIndex, Google Agent Development Kit (ADK)
Agentic AI, Multi-agent systems, Large Lan- guage Models (LLMs), Academic knowledge management, Lit- erature review automation, Research automation, Document summarization, Information retrieval, ArXiv summarization, Text mining in education, Framework comparison, Workflow orchestration, Artificial Intelligence in academia, AutoGen, Cre- wAI, LangGraph, Semantic Kernel, LlamaIndex, Google Agent Development Kit (ADK)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
